
After a long, Covid-related delay, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) finally released its latest Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance Report, and the numbers are disturbing. For the 6th consecutive year, the STD rate in the United States hit a record high.
Covid-19 has understandably dominated the news over the past 22 months. As we head into recovery and our economy begins to open up in the summer, it’s important not to lose sight of the viruses that predated the pandemic and currently infect over 110 million Americans, with over 20 million new infections each year.
For our 5th annual study of STD rates, the Innerbody Research team analyzed the latest statistics on a city-by-city basis and developed our list of the Top 100 cities with the highest STD rates. In this year’s report, the city with the highest STD rate was Jackson, MS, overtaking Baltimore, MD, which moved to 2nd.
In addition to ranking the 100 cities with the highest STD rates, below we’ll provide some takeaways from our report; spotlight cities whose STD rates have significantly improved or declined; highlight racial disparities that emerge from the CDC’s data; and address what this data means in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Quick takeaways
Cities show movement in our rankings
Data illuminates racial inequities
Military cities
The Rankings: Top 25 U.S. cities with the highest STD rates
Rounding out our Top 100
Covid-19 and underreporting STD rates
Proposed actions to improve the national outlook
How we collected data for this report
Sources
About Innerbody Research
Before we get to the full rankings, here are some findings and trends that we observed:
- Chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis top the list of most commonly reported new STD infections. Taken together, infections from these three reportable diseases increased almost 30% from 2015 to 2019.
- The South continues to be disproportionately represented among the hardest-hit cities. Of the Top 25, 17 are southern cities (or 19, if you use the Census Bureau’s definition to include Baltimore and the District of Columbia).
- Four of the Top 25 cities are located in Florida, which is a worrisome development for the Sunshine State. Miami, for instance, spiked upward five spots to the 24th highest rate.
- Meanwhile, across the continent, major California cities saw an increase in STD rates. San Francisco swapped positions with Philadelphia, PA to rank 3rd highest (up from 4th). Los Angeles, San Diego, and Sacramento all rose over ten spots to rank 37th, 55th, and 51st, respectively.
- California and Texas tie for the state with the most cities in our rankings, at 14 apiece, though these are after all two of the largest states in our country. But Alabama – at around two percent of our national population – is one of the more overrepresented states, with six cities in our report.
- We noted that three of the Top 10 cities are relatively small (Augusta, GA, Montgomery, AL, and Fayetteville, NC) but share one thing in common: they are home to relatively large military bases.
Numerous cities saw significant movement upward with higher infection rates, including:
- Washington, DC rose 12 spots from 17 → 5
- Knoxville, TN rose 17 spots from 26 → 9
- New Orleans, LA rose 13 spots from 24 → 11
- Jacksonville, FL rose 15 spots from 38 → 23
- Albany, NY rose 15 spots from 68 → 53
It wasn’t all bad news; some cities bucked the national trend with improved STD rates. For instance, Milwaukee, WI and Indianapolis, IN both moved out of the Top 10, though they remain among the Top 25 cities.
Other cities’ infection rates improved dramatically, such as:
- Shreveport, LA improved 12 spots from 9 → 21
- Denver, CO improved 13 spots from 19 → 32
- Richmond, VA improved 12 spots from 32 → 44
- Portland, OR improved 15 spots from 73 → 88
- Omaha, NE improved 13 spots from 79 → 92
The CDC’s data this year highlights an ongoing trend that appears to worsen each year: the STD burden is not equal within our cities. While we are seeing increases in STDs overall across many groups, the STD burden continued to hit minority racial and ethnic groups the hardest. The fact that many of the highest-ranking cities in our study have a higher percentage of minority residents also appears to reflect this trend.
Based on CDC data, STD rates were:
- 5-8 times higher for African Americans or Black people than for non-Hispanic White people
- 3-5 times higher for American Indians, Native Alaskans, and Native Hawaiians than for non-Hispanic White people
- 1-2 times higher for Hispanic or Latino people than for non-Hispanic white people
Experts such as the CDC’s Jo Valentine, Director of the Office of Health Equity, point to systemic inequalities that lead to lower access to health and testing and subsequently poorer health outcomes.
“Focusing on hard-hit populations is critical to reducing disparities,” said Valentine. “To effectively reduce these disparities, the social, cultural, and economic conditions that make it more difficult for some populations to stay healthy must be addressed. These include poverty, unstable housing, drug use, lack of medical insurance or regular medical provider, and high burden of STDs in some communities.”
We saw another noteworthy trend when examining cities with the top STD rates. Among the 10 cities with the highest rates, three are cities that are small in population relative to the others, but they happen to be the location of large military bases:
- Augusta, GA (Fort Gordon Army Base)
- Montgomery, AL (Maxwell-Gunter Air Force Base)
- Fayetteville, NC (Fort Bragg, the largest base in the country)
And these cities are not alone. Elsewhere on the list, we find:
- 21st highest: Shreveport, LA (Barksdale Air Force Base)
- 29th highest: Norfolk, VA (Naval Station Norfolk, the world’s largest naval station)
- 63rd highest: Killeen, TX (Fort Hood Army Base)
- 83rd highest: Tacoma, WA (Joint Base Lewis-McChord)
Fort Bragg, Fort Hood, and Joint Base Lewis-McChord are among the top military bases in the world by population.
Jackson, MS

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
4,281
-
HIV Cases
2,541
-
Chlamydia Cases
3,984
-
Gonorrhea Cases
2,081
-
Syphilis Cases
100
Baltimore, MD

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
3,707
-
HIV Cases
9,441
-
Chlamydia Cases
8,602
-
Gonorrhea Cases
3,982
-
Syphilis Cases
312
San Francisco, CA

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
3,150
-
HIV Cases
12,149
-
Chlamydia Cases
9,505
-
Gonorrhea Cases
5,593
-
Syphilis Cases
579
Philadelphia, PA

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
2,827
-
HIV Cases
16,917
-
Chlamydia Cases
20,354
-
Gonorrhea Cases
7,043
-
Syphilis Cases
470
Washington DC

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
2,771
-
HIV Cases
62
-
Chlamydia Cases
17,589
-
Gonorrhea Cases
2,236
-
Syphilis Cases
865
Augusta, GA

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
2,596
-
HIV Cases
1,400
-
Chlamydia Cases
2,636
-
Gonorrhea Cases
1,100
-
Syphilis Cases
97
New York, NY

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
2,544
-
HIV Cases
97,206
-
Chlamydia Cases
74,014
-
Gonorrhea Cases
28,394
-
Syphilis Cases
1,952
Montgomery, AL

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
2,365
-
HIV Cases
1,470
-
Chlamydia Cases
2,569
-
Gonorrhea Cases
1,226
-
Syphilis Cases
75
Knoxville, TN

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
2,314
-
HIV Cases
960
-
Chlamydia Cases
3,710
-
Gonorrhea Cases
1,626
-
Syphilis Cases
34
Fayetteville, NC

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
2,255
-
HIV Cases
1,368
-
Chlamydia Cases
4,337
-
Gonorrhea Cases
1,741
-
Syphilis Cases
49
New Orleans, LA

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
2,213
-
HIV Cases
6,911
-
Chlamydia Cases
8,190
-
Gonorrhea Cases
3,004
-
Syphilis Cases
153
Memphis, TN

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
2,045
-
HIV Cases
6,601
-
Chlamydia Cases
11,407
-
Gonorrhea Cases
4,620
-
Syphilis Cases
226
Milwaukee, WI

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
2,007
-
HIV Cases
2,144
-
Chlamydia Cases
11,703
-
Gonorrhea Cases
5,083
-
Syphilis Cases
101
Tallahassee, FL

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
1,990
-
HIV Cases
1,257
-
Chlamydia Cases
3,379
-
Gonorrhea Cases
1,083
-
Syphilis Cases
101
Indianapolis, IN

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
1,905
-
HIV Cases
4,736
-
Chlamydia Cases
10,503
-
Gonorrhea Cases
4,073
-
Syphilis Cases
154
Baton Rouge, LA

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
1,893
-
HIV Cases
4,173
-
Chlamydia Cases
4,781
-
Gonorrhea Cases
1,635
-
Syphilis Cases
118
Fort Lauderdale, FL

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
1,871
-
HIV Cases
19,483
-
Chlamydia Cases
12,167
-
Gonorrhea Cases
4,436
-
Syphilis Cases
426
Columbia, SC

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
1,817
-
HIV Cases
3,879
-
Chlamydia Cases
6,405
-
Gonorrhea Cases
2,505
-
Syphilis Cases
105
Little Rock, AR

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
1,791
-
HIV Cases
1,940
-
Chlamydia Cases
3,419
-
Gonorrhea Cases
1,513
-
Syphilis Cases
160
Savannah, GA

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
1,783
-
HIV Cases
1,696
-
Chlamydia Cases
2,633
-
Gonorrhea Cases
765
-
Syphilis Cases
62
Shreveport, LA

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
1,758
-
HIV Cases
1,437
-
Chlamydia Cases
3,543
-
Gonorrhea Cases
1,447
-
Syphilis Cases
78
Atlanta, GA

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
1,714
-
HIV Cases
31,833
-
Chlamydia Cases
23,724
-
Gonorrhea Cases
8,136
-
Syphilis Cases
1,100
Jacksonville, FL

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
1,694
-
HIV Cases
6,450
-
Chlamydia Cases
8,810
-
Gonorrhea Cases
4,259
-
Syphilis Cases
239
Miami, FL

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
1,686
-
HIV Cases
26,316
-
Chlamydia Cases
14,680
-
Gonorrhea Cases
4,971
-
Syphilis Cases
581
Cleveland, OH

-
STD Cases / 100K Population
1,681
-
HIV Cases
4,617
-
Chlamydia Cases
11,051
-
Gonorrhea Cases
5,146
-
Syphilis Cases
92
Last year, many cities outside of the Top 100 asked us for their ranking. So this year, we decided to expand our report to include the next 50 cities with the highest STD rates by rank.
Rank | Metro Area | STD Cases / 100K | HIV Cases | Chlamydia Cases | Gonorrhea Cases | Syphilis Cases |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 | Charlotte, NC | 1,680 | 6,544 | 11,377 | 3,943 | 261 |
27 | Gainesville, FL | 1,672 | 1,009 | 2,672 | 779 | 55 |
28 | Greensboro, NC | 1,667 | 4,392 | 9,354 | 4,101 | 145 |
29 | Norfolk, VA | 1,666 | 4,115 | 9,672 | 3,276 | 125 |
30 | Cincinatti, OH | 1,584 | 2,943 | 7,126 | 2,762 | 108 |
31 | Peoria, IL | 1,565 | 355 | 1,578 | 880 | 13 |
32 | Denver, CO | 1,565 | 8,226 | 15,153 | 5,741 | 292 |
33 | Columbus, OH | 1,550 | 4,833 | 10,302 | 4,957 | 213 |
34 | Biloxi, MS | 1,543 | 652 | 1,626 | 864 | 46 |
35 | Birmingham, AL | 1,532 | 4,007 | 6,751 | 3,390 | 142 |
36 | Chicago, IL | 1,520 | 26,131 | 50,825 | 19,400 | 1,060 |
37 | Los Angeles, CA | 1,464 | 49,449 | 69,712 | 26,195 | 2,550 |
38 | Pensacola, FL | 1,460 | 1,280 | 2,355 | 949 | 23 |
39 | Louisville, KY | 1,455 | 2,983 | 5,608 | 2,442 | 181 |
40 | Toledo, OH | 1,446 | 939 | 3,445 | 1,800 | 34 |
41 | Rochester, NY | 1,426 | 2,290 | 5,787 | 2,302 | 207 |
42 | Anchorage, AK | 1,426 | 0 | 2,771 | 1,282 | 103 |
43 | Kalamazoo, MI | 1,423 | 365 | 2,304 | 1,079 | 20 |
44 | Richmond, VA | 1,411 | 2,495 | 7,339 | 2,818 | 143 |
45 | Huntsville, AL | 1,409 | 800 | 2,845 | 1,472 | 47 |
46 | Newark, NJ | 1,389 | 12,421 | 10,356 | 2,776 | 170 |
47 | Jersey City, NJ | 1,375 | 4,884 | 3,409 | 922 | 79 |
48 | Albuquerque, NM | 1,361 | 1,495 | 5,372 | 2,101 | 267 |
49 | Lexington, KY | 1,350 | 919 | 2,574 | 809 | 69 |
50 | Orlando, FL | 1,321 | 10,882 | 13,618 | 4,250 | 380 |
51 | Sacramento, CA | 1,302 | 4,285 | 11,076 | 4,270 | 433 |
52 | Dayton, OH | 1,294 | 1,412 | 3,398 | 2,007 | 70 |
53 | Albany, NY | 1,292 | 1,146 | 2,015 | 742 | 66 |
54 | Las Vegas, NV | 1,287 | 8,600 | 14,044 | 5,448 | 628 |
55 | San Diego, CA | 1,285 | 13,131 | 22,920 | 6,366 | 547 |
56 | Mobile, AL | 1,280 | 2,160 | 4,101 | 1,734 | 94 |
57 | Tuscaloosa, AL | 1,276 | 494 | 1,537 | 575 | 59 |
58 | Raleigh, NC | 1,264 | 4,972 | 9,288 | 3,294 | 252 |
59 | Chattanooga, TN | 1,264 | 991 | 2,486 | 1,098 | 28 |
60 | Lubbock, TX | 1,257 | 510 | 2,237 | 1,079 | 37 |
61 | Dallas, TX | 1,249 | 21,409 | 24,647 | 9,795 | 360 |
62 | Austin, TX | 1,247 | 4,931 | 7,681 | 2,739 | 217 |
63 | Beaumont, TX | 1,240 | 1,235 | 1,324 | 564 | 39 |
64 | Corpus Christi, TX | 1,239 | 633 | 2,883 | 838 | 134 |
65 | Oklahoma City, OK | 1,239 | 2,689 | 8,287 | 3,811 | 311 |
66 | Killeen, TX | 1,233 | 1,018 | 3,097 | 1,136 | 56 |
67 | St. Louis, MO | 1,224 | 2,467 | 6,599 | 2,997 | 136 |
68 | Bakersfield, CA | 1,220 | 1,697 | 6,876 | 2,102 | 264 |
69 | Decatur, AL | 1,194 | 293 | 1,435 | 931 | 13 |
70 | Kansas City, MO | 1,192 | 3,980 | 9,766 | 4,314 | 344 |
71 | Fresno, CA | 1,186 | 1,981 | 7,225 | 2,397 | 188 |
72 | Oakland, CA | 1,179 | 6,055 | 9,645 | 3,669 | 290 |
73 | Wichita, KS | 1,176 | 837 | 3,577 | 1,566 | 58 |
74 | Des Moines, IA | 1,170 | 791 | 3,468 | 1,392 | 49 |
75 | Fort Wayne, IN | 1,165 | 539 | 2,781 | 1,044 | 9 |
76 | Harrisburg, PA | 1,148 | 597 | 1,875 | 670 | 38 |
77 | Greenville, SC | 1,147 | 1,416 | 3,138 | 1,276 | 70 |
78 | Wilmington, DE | 1,132 | 2,064 | 3,400 | 818 | 52 |
79 | Phoenix, AZ | 1,132 | 12,291 | 30,413 | 11,317 | 979 |
80 | Atlantic City, NJ | 1,129 | 1,213 | 1,338 | 431 | 16 |
81 | Syracuse, NY | 1,129 | 1,174 | 2,984 | 1,039 | 19 |
82 | Lafayette, LA | 1,129 | 943 | 1,874 | 603 | 24 |
83 | Tacoma, WA | 1,129 | 1,493 | 6,344 | 2,135 | 91 |
84 | Flint, MI | 1,128 | 561 | 2,916 | 1,089 | 23 |
85 | Tampa, FL | 1,124 | 12,445 | 15,370 | 4,838 | 520 |
86 | Tucson, AZ | 1,121 | 2,579 | 6,677 | 2,211 | 176 |
87 | Detroit, MI | 1,117 | 9,986 | 23,353 | 9,607 | 477 |
88 | Portland, OR | 1,116 | 4,051 | 8,153 | 3,265 | 267 |
89 | South Bend, IN | 1,104 | 540 | 1,792 | 650 | 8 |
90 | Myrtle Beach, SC | 1,084 | 982 | 2,019 | 708 | 22 |
91 | Sioux Falls, SD | 1,084 | 266 | 1,127 | 681 | 16 |
92 | Omaha, NE | 1,074 | 232 | 4,137 | 1,662 | 59 |
93 | Houston, TX | 1,073 | 28,145 | 27,188 | 9,287 | 594 |
94 | Buffalo, NY | 1,066 | 2,293 | 5,496 | 1,950 | 67 |
95 | Palm Beach, FL | 1,065 | 7,917 | 6,304 | 1,484 | 121 |
96 | Stockton, CA | 1,061 | 1,316 | 4,762 | 1,698 | 209 |
97 | New Haven, CT | 1,060 | 3,231 | 4,337 | 1,467 | 60 |
98 | Providence, RI | 1,057 | 980 | 4,392 | 1,270 | 82 |
99 | Akron, OH | 1,055 | 930 | 3,462 | 1,298 | 28 |
100 | Minneapolis, MN | 1,055 | 6,664 | 14,696 | 5,694 | 250 |
101 | Seattle, WA | 1,053 | 6,899 | 11,639 | 4,640 | 338 |
102 | Trenton, NJ | 1,052 | 1,371 | 1,952 | 530 | 39 |
103 | Riverside, CA | 1,046 | 13,483 | 26,034 | 7,958 | 883 |
104 | Nashville, TN | 1,023 | 562 | 2,087 | 645 | 31 |
105 | Merced, CA | 985 | 295 | 1,653 | 690 | 68 |
106 | Waco, TX | 983 | 466 | 1,490 | 522 | 25 |
107 | Evansville, IN | 977 | 289 | 1,113 | 533 | 21 |
108 | Fayetteville, AR | 971 | 332 | 1,549 | 401 | 18 |
109 | Ocala, FL | 961 | 1,060 | 1,761 | 615 | 24 |
110 | Lansing, MI | 955 | 439 | 1,799 | 532 | 26 |
111 | Honolulu, HI | 943 | 1,530 | 6,399 | 1,208 | 101 |
112 | Hartford, CT | 941 | 3,721 | 5,451 | 1,681 | 63 |
113 | Modesto, CA | 937 | 795 | 3,228 | 980 | 149 |
114 | Youngstown, OH | 932 | 503 | 1,177 | 449 | 12 |
115 | Boston, MA | 927 | 14,560 | 22,030 | 5,235 | 452 |
116 | Galveston, TX | 921 | 1,179 | 1,438 | 480 | 14 |
117 | San Antonio, TX | 912 | 6,308 | 8,531 | 3,035 | 244 |
118 | Colorado Springs, CO | 890 | 915 | 4,130 | 1,267 | 41 |
119 | Gary, IN | 882 | 1,028 | 2,408 | 799 | 36 |
120 | Pittsburgh, PA | 882 | 2,456 | 6,301 | 1,914 | 71 |
121 | Sarasota, FL | 879 | 1,061 | 1,722 | 614 | 72 |
122 | Spokane, WA | 872 | 640 | 2,670 | 1,053 | 125 |
123 | Cedar Rapids, IA | 869 | 290 | 1,249 | 417 | 8 |
124 | Fort Worth, TX | 868 | 5,727 | 8,885 | 3,271 | 210 |
125 | Salinas, CA | 840 | 729 | 2,425 | 471 | 33 |
126 | Daytona Beach, FL | 836 | 1,745 | 2,046 | 715 | 69 |
127 | Salem, OR | 834 | 435 | 1,886 | 547 | 24 |
128 | Madison, WI | 832 | 551 | 2,990 | 960 | 11 |
129 | Santa Barbara, CA | 823 | 538 | 2,624 | 457 | 55 |
130 | Grand Rapids, MI | 810 | 1,296 | 5,716 | 2,011 | 29 |
131 | Eugene, OR | 789 | 418 | 1,931 | 592 | 54 |
132 | Brownsville, TX | 784 | 934 | 2,077 | 313 | 1 |
133 | El Paso, TX | 776 | 2,230 | 3,509 | 702 | 87 |
134 | Lincoln, NE | 771 | 78 | 1,802 | 543 | 24 |
135 | Canton, OH | 759 | 480 | 1,784 | 538 | 20 |
136 | Fairfield, CT | 743 | 2,657 | 3,507 | 795 | 56 |
137 | San Jose, CA | 738 | 3,269 | 8,143 | 2,504 | 392 |
138 | Utica, NY | 699 | 578 | 851 | 162 | 13 |
139 | Salt Lake City, UT | 696 | 2,153 | 6,297 | 1,923 | 98 |
140 | Erie, PA | 653 | 182 | 1,259 | 331 | 5 |
141 | Nassau, NY | 648 | 2,951 | 4,960 | 818 | 72 |
142 | Boulder, CO | 637 | 468 | 1,359 | 236 | 14 |
143 | Boise, ID | 630 | 162 | 2,203 | 580 | 14 |
144 | Green Bay, WI | 612 | 169 | 1,192 | 248 | 3 |
145 | Naples, FL | 606 | 960 | 1,124 | 181 | 28 |
146 | Scranton, PA | 601 | 275 | 1,391 | 222 | 21 |
147 | McAllen, TX | 593 | 1,464 | 3,140 | 520 | 12 |
148 | Fort Collins, CO | 548 | 285 | 1,362 | 263 | 11 |
149 | Manchester, NH | 304 | 313 | 980 | 91 | 17 |
150 | Provo, UT | 273 | 214 | 1,255 | 224 | 5 |
One urgent question is unique to our current moment: do the CDC’s numbers paint an accurate picture of the extent of our problems today or are STD infections now underreported due to insufficient pandemic-era testing?
During the pandemic, many testing labs lacked sufficient personnel or had to shift focus entirely to Covid-19 in an attempt to keep up during the deadly surges. This led to serious under-testing at what amounted to a high-water mark in STD infections nationwide.
Understanding that people did not stop having sex during the past year, experts fear that the lack of normal access to STD testing and treatment likely means our infection rates are, if anything, higher than they appear in this latest report. As recently as January 2021, a survey revealed that over a third of staff in STD testing programs at the state and local levels have needed to remain focused on Covid-19.
We’re often asked how metropolitan areas can take actions to improve STD rates. For this, we’re inclined to turn to the STI National Strategic Plan released by the HHS. It provides recommended approaches and enhancements aimed at turning our trends in a positive direction. Among its proposals are:
- Partnering with pharmacies and clinics to increase easy local access to STD testing and treatment.
- Establishing express clinics, where people could access walk-in testing and treatment without full exams.
- Harnessing the potential of telehealth/telemedicine as a convenient method of testing and consultation for people across the country, including in rural areas. (If you live in such an area, are uncomfortable talking with your doctor, or just can’t find the time to go get tested, an increasingly popular option is to take an at-home STD test.)
The CDC stresses, “If you are sexually active, getting tested for STDs is one of the most important things you can do to protect your health. Make sure you have an open and honest conversation about your sexual history and STD testing with your doctor…”
Our STD testing and treatment infrastructure had been strained prior to the pandemic, contributing to increased STD rates each year. It’s up to all of us to decide whether reports next year and the year after reveal the 7th and 8th consecutive years of record-high infections or we instead make this tide turn, addressing budget shortfalls and improving public education and access to testing and treatment in our communities.
All of the STD data found in our report – including case statistics for HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia – are from the CDC’s latest data release. Syphilis data includes only primary and secondary syphilis cases and does not include congenital and early latent syphilis cases. HIV cases are not reported for some cities. Statistics for other relatively common STDs, such as herpes, are not collected by the CDC at this time and hence are left out of our analysis. For more information about which statistics the CDC does and does not track, see its STD Data & Statistics page.
All estimated metro area and state population data is from the CDC and the US Census Bureau. For our interactive map, our research team decided to use counties as visual proxies for most metro areas. The CDC does not have STD data for all US counties.
For our rankings, we chose to include only city metro areas with an estimated population of 200,000 or more. Though Washington, DC is technically a district, we chose to include it as a city. No statistical testing was used during the production of this research.
https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2019/default.htm
https://www.ncsddc.org/resource/covid-19-and-the-state-of-the-std-field-phase-iii
https://www.cdc.gov/std/chlamydia/default.htm
https://www.cdc.gov/std/gonorrhea/default.htm
https://www.cdc.gov/std/syphilis/default.htm
https://www.cdc.gov/std/hiv/default.htm
https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/explore-health-rankings
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/surveillance-data-tables/vol-1-no-3/index.html
https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats18/default.htm
https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/nchhstpatlas/tables.html
https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/2010s-counties-total.html
STD Information:
STD Symptoms & Causes from the Mayo Clinic
STD Guide from Planned Parenthood
STD Awareness for Teens from KidsHealth
STD Testing Resources:
Mayo Clinic: STD Testing Guide
Planned Parenthood: STD Testing
Innerbody: STD Testing At-Home Guide
STD Testing Companies:
LetsGetChecked Review | MyLAB Box Review
STDcheck Review | Everlywell Review
BlueChew Review | BlueChew Free Trial
Support Resources:
BetterHelp | Talkspace
Innerbody Research is committed to preventing the rapid spread of STDs. The reason why we invest the time and effort into creating this and other STD-related research and guides is to raise STD prevention awareness by making this information widely available. We hope to reach as many people as possible. As such, please feel free to share our content for educational, editorial, or discussion purposes. We only ask that you link back to this page and credit the author as Innerbody.com. https://www.innerbody.com/std-testing/std-statistics
Founded in 1998, Innerbody Research strives to provide objective, science-based research and advice to help our readers make more informed choices about home health products and services. Each month, we help over 2 million visitors live healthier lifestyles.
Our researchers and expert writers have advanced degrees in relevant scientific fields and all content that contains medical-related information is thoroughly reviewed by one or more members of Innerbody Research’s Medical Review Board, which consists of board-certified physicians and medical experts from across the country.
If you have any questions or feedback regarding this research or any other material on our website, or if you would like to interview one of this study’s authors, please email us at media@innerbody.com.